#Sugarsync vs spideroak crashplan free

But unlike the 30-day free trials, the 5 GB SugarSync plan is free forever. The free version gives you just 2 GB 5 GB of storage space and a few limitations, such as smaller file sizes for sharing, syncing for two machines only, and only two backed-up versions of each file, instead of five. You can add storage 100 GB at a time for $29.99 per month, or add users for $9.99 each. There is also a Business plan, which gives you 100 GB of storage for up to 3 users for $29.99 a month.

#Sugarsync vs spideroak crashplan upgrade

If you need more space, you can upgrade to the Power Users plan, which starts at $9.99 a month for 60 GB and ranges up to $49.99 for 500 GB.

#Sugarsync vs spideroak crashplan trial

If you sign up for the year subscription, you are basically getting three months for free, since you get a 30 day free trial and savings of about $10 for subscribing for the whole year. The lowest standard tier for SugarSync is the “ Starter Plan” which comes with 30 GB of storage for $4.99 a month or $49.99 a year.

You’ll notice many of these similarities from the get-go, from the pricing tiers and storage allotments for the free version ( which is kind of buried for SugarSync) to the friendly Getting Started tutorial which promises free additional storage for completing the steps and referring friends. There is a lot in common between Dropbox and Sugarsync, simply because both of these champs got a lot of things right. Check out groovyBox if you want to use your Dropbox account as a cloud music player. Well, we waited and waited for Dropbox to catch up with SugarSync and add this feature, but it still hasn’t happened. Update: In this review, I note Dropbox’s inability to stream music as a playlist as one of it’s drawbacks compared to SugarSync.

#Sugarsync vs spideroak crashplan update

See the update for a summary of this review and a roundup of some of the good points raised in the discussion. Update: It’s been quite some time since I originally posted this review, and commenters have done a groovy job of chiming in with some great feedback and testimonials. So, without any further ado, here’s an investigation of what those differences are, and if they add up to SugarSync being a Dropbox killer. But it seems like SugarSync has a couple of things to offer that Dropbox doesn’t. Granted, this chart is somewhat dated, as Dropbox has closed the gap on at least the business plans front with Dropbox for Teams. Dropbox and the other cloud storage/folder syncing heavyweights: MobileMe, Box.net, Carbonite, and Mozy.Īs expected, most of the checkmarks were grouped beneath the first two columns, with SugarSync winning out with a few key features, namely: backup to any folder, upload/sync via email, selectively sync any folder, simple editing of files through the web, send files of any size, stream music to a web browser or smartphone, business plans and support for BlackBerry, Symbian and Windows Mobile. I must not be the only one who feels this way, because right there on the front page of SugarSync’s website is a link to a comparison chart between SugarSync vs. At first blush, SugarSync struck me as the Dropbox alternative that I never asked for. So, when an assignment to review SugarSync came across my desk ( not really, MrGroove didn’t give me a desk…), I raised a skeptical eyebrow. I’m a Dropbox man-always have been, always will be. Best security practice for both: encrypt your important documents using TrueCrypt or BoxCryptor.

SugarSync hasn’t gotten any heat, but likely suffers from the same vulnerabilities. Dropbox has been featured in the news for a few security SNAFUs.

Many users report that Dropbox has faster upload / sync speeds than SugarSync.

Dropbox requires a third-party app, such as groovyBox.

SugarSync has native support for music playback on the web and for smartphones.

Dropbox allows you to share files up to 1 GB via public links or email.

Free storage – SugarSync: 5 GB, Dropbox: 2 GB.